©1999 - Publication Rights Reserved
We encourage feedback on this concept and on the paper itself. We'd be pleased to publish reasonable comments in future versions of this site. Please restrict your comments to carbon dioxide sequestration, we do not want a debate on global warming.
New links have been added at the end of this page.
With the current concerns about global warming, the Kyoto agreement, carbon taxes, and the like (which you may or may not share), there has been increased concern about the fate of atmospheric carbon dioxide. It has been suggested by Yamasaki, et al. (1998), and others [also see Chopey (1999) for example], that one way to dispose of anthropogenic (man-made) carbon dioxide is to compress it and inject it into the ocean. If it is injected a sufficient depth it will form a stable gas hydrate and should remain there indefinitely.
Global warming via greenhouse gases (such as carbon dioxide) is a hot topic worldwide. The recent Kyoto meeting on greenhouse gas emissions, and other environmental topics, is a clear example of this.
Among engineers (and others), global warming remains very controversial. Many question whether or not the earth is warming at all. Others question whether or not greenhouses gases are to blame for the apparent warming. Regardless, legislatures the world over are convinced and slowly reductions in emissions of gases, such as carbon dioxide, are becoming law. Some European nations have already imposed a "Carbon Tax". Others are sure to follow.
It is the responsibility of engineers to discover ways to deal with reductions in emissions whether or not they believe them to be problematic. Legislation will force them into making these designs. And like any engineering design, it must be a combination of technical feasibility and economic prudence.
One scheme proposed to deal with flue gas emissions is to inject them into the ocean. At the temperature and pressure in the ocean a hydrate will form and thus the carbon dioxide is not emitted to the atmosphere.
Presented in this paper are some preliminary engineering considerations for the design of such a scheme.
The first question that must be answered is "What depth must the carbon dioxide be injected to in order to form hydrates?" The depth must be such that a there is sufficient pressure for a hydrate to form.
If we assume that seawater is a 3.5 wt% solution of sodium chloride, CSMHYD (Sloan, 1998) can be used to estimate the hydrate formation for pure carbon dioxide. The temperature-pressure for such a hydrate locus is given in Table 1.
Table 1 Hydrate Formation Pressure and Depths for Sequestering Carbon Dioxide Temp Press Depth (deg C) (kPa) (m) ------- ----- ------ -1 1334 121 0 1490 136 1 1667 153 2 1869 173 3 2100 196 4 2366 222 5 2676 252Note, the inhibiting effect of the salt in the seawater is fairly small, but it was included in this as subsequent calculations.
From these pressures the hydrostatic equation can be used to calculate the depth. The hydrostatic equation is:
P - P(atm) = d g h where P is the hydrate formation pressure, Pa P(atm) is atmospheric pressure, Pa (101 325 Pa) d is the density of seawater, kg/m¦ g is the acceleration due to gravity (9.81 m¦/s) h is the depth, mWhen using this equation, the user is cautioned to use the proper units (as noted above). This comment is more appropriate when American Engineering Units are used. It is very easy to make a mistake.
If we further assume that the density of seawater is 1.04 g/cm³, it is an easy matter to calculate the depth required to achieve the hydrate pressure. The estimated depths are also given in Table 1. From this table it can be seen that if the carbon dioxide is injected to a depth of greater than 250 m a hydrate will form.
Next the required injection pressure must be calculated. This is done in a manner similar to that for acid gas injection. Using AGIProfile (Carroll and Maddocks, 1999) the injection pressure is estimated to be 2527 kPa. (output from AGIProfile - use BACK on your browser to return).
If the carbon dioxide is injected to a depth of 140 m (i.e., assuming the water is at 0°C), what happens if the water warms? If the temperature rises, the pressure required to keep the carbon dioxide in the hydrate form also increases. Thus if the carbon dioxide is not injected to a sufficient depth, then the warming could release the carbon dioxide.
The density of the carbon dioxide hydrate is approximately 1.1 g/cm³ - slightly larger than seawater. This means that the hydrate will sink to the ocean floor. If the hydrate were less dense than seawater (such as ice), then the hydrate would float. Once it reached the surface it would quickly melt releasing the carbon dioxide.
In contrast, the methane hydrate is less dense than water (density approximately 0.91 g/cm³). Therefore, methane could not be sequestered in this fashion.
Therefore, this process works because the carbon dioxide hydrate is denser than seawater.
It was assumed that the gas injected was pure carbon dioxide. What if the gas contain other components? If the gas to be disposed is from a fossil fuel gas plant, the gas is most likely to be a mixture of carbon dioxide, nitrogen, oxygen, and a few other impurities (notably SOx and NOx).
For the next scenario, assume that the gas to be injected is 90% carbon dioxide and 10% nitrogen. Again, using CSMHYD, the hydrate formation pressure can be estimated. Note the presence of the nitrogen increases the hydrate formation pressures by between 10 and 20%.
Table 2 Hydrate Formation Pressure and Depths for Sequestering Carbon Dioxide(90%) and Nitrogen (10%) Temp Press Depth (deg C) (kPa) (m) ------- ----- ------ -1 1487 136 0 1663 153 1 1863 173 2 2092 195 3 2355 221 4 2660 251 5 3019 296Assuming a pressure of 3000 kPa, AGIProfile can be used to estimate the required surface injection pressure for this mixture. The estimated injection pressure is 2800 kPa.
A check of the pressure calculated for both the hydrate forming conditions and for the phase envelope indicate that in neither case is it necessary to liquefy the gas.
The question of whether or not this should be done has not yet been raised. In essence, this process is really dumping human waste into the ocean. Is it ever a good idea to dispose of human waste in the ocean?
What is the effect of this hydrate on the ecosystem of the sea floor? Surely it is not totally benign. If nothing else, the solids will cover the sea floor. Would this be any different from covering the sea floor with other solid material?
We welcome your comments.
- Carroll, J.J. and Maddocks, J., "Design Considerations for Acid Gas Injection", Laurance Reid Gas Conditioning Conference, Norman, OK, February (1999).
- Chopey, N.P., "Technology to Cool Down Global Warming", Chemical Engineering, pp. 37-41, January (1999).
- Slaon E.D., Clathrate Hydrates of Natural Gas, 2nd Ed., Marcel Dekker, New York, NY, (1998).
- Yamasaki, A., et al. "A Novel Ocean Disposal-Scenario: Disposal of Anthropogenic Carbon Dioxide in the Ocean via a Submerged Hydrate Crystallizer", AIChE Annual Meeting, Miami Beach, FL, Nov. (1998).
- FUELS DECARBONIZATION AND CARBON SEQUESTRATION: REPORT OF A WORKSHOP
![]()
- Can Ocean Hold CO2? - ABCNEWS.com
![]()
- Science considers 'sequestration' of carbon dioxide - NCTimes Net
![]()
- Into the Abyss - New Scientist
![]()
- US Department of Energy report
- Pacific International Center for High Technology Research
- Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute
- Yamasaki, A., et al. (1998) - Abstract
- Carbon-dioxide capture and sequestration - from ABB
- Chopey article from Chemical Engineering
- Paper by Carroll and Maddocks (1999)
We welcome suggestions for links to other sites on the sequestration of carbon dioxide in the ocean. Contact us via E-mail at: jcarroll@telusplanet.net.
AQUAlibrium Web Page Site Map: